Slavery Persistence in the revolutionary period.
Race as well as revolution can be taken as an incisive reading of the revolutionary individuals ancient endeavors to highlight their open resistance to slavery and the main features of the process of revolution. According to Nash, revolutionary leaders had a knowledge about the slavery incompatibility together with the equalitarian ideology they possessed (1990). Nash has illuminated the serious challenge of slavery as well as race in the period of revolution together with the major tragic shortcoming of the leaders of America. Moreover, the role of the black revolutionist was ignored in the efforts of gaining freedom for a long time (Nash, 1990).
Contrary to the ancient historians, Nash has attributed continued existence of slavery in the revolutionary period to the leaders of the north that were reluctant to give compensation to the slaveholders from the south or even accept America in a biracial form. This was a time that the slavery could actually have been abolished completely. He gives an assertion that the free blacks went native to the discrimination at the north through the creation of alternative institution and organizations such as churches for the blacks. These were meant to safeguard an identity of Africa-America as well as maintain abolitionist fervor. Nash states out that race and revolution is the undeniable story that failed pursuit of freedom that was promised in the revolutionary period. It was the most philosophical crisis of ethics for white Americans at the end of the eighteenth century which became their most tragic failure and disappointment. Nash analyzes the contentious matters challenging the Founding Founders, such as slavery as well as property rights, whilst putting more emphasis on the impressive accomplishments of the Founders that far overshadow their failure to successfully resolve the hot subject of slavery (Nash, 1990).
Nash presents a convincing narrative highlighting that the Founders were very conscious that human slavery was ethically contrary to their uncensored ideology based upon indisputable human rights, but they also understood that leaving out slavery and giving way political and social equality to African slaves would have been incompatible with existing public opinion in the emerging nation. Slavery could therefore persist due to these laws which were not established regarding equality. Therefore to make sure that the slaves did not have any power, the northern leaders did not accept the young nation in a biracial perspective. Nash has stressed that it is no longer the economic and social structures of the south that caused a failure to abolish slave trade as earlier stated by past historians.
The hypocrisy and racism of the north in so far as southern intransigence supported the peculiar institution. Nash explains the free black communitys reaction to this failure of the revolutions promise, its vigorous and articulate pleas for justice, and the communitys successes in building its own African-American institutions within the hostile environment of early nineteenth-century America (Gilyard Wardi, 2004). While his interpretation may startle some, Nash correctly finds the demise of efforts to abolish slavery and incorporate blacks into the American society. This book not only illuminates the failures of Americas leaders during this time, but also brings to the forefront the long ignored role of black revolutionist in the early struggles for freedom.
Colonists Attitude towards SlaveryThe colonialists sought to own slaves during the revolution process. They used the slaves as a source of labor for their farms. In the 1600s, tobacco was regarded as a major source of earnings for many of the colonists. The success economically of the colonist relied entirely on the amount of produce that came from tobacco. This produce was also determined by the labor force. The colonists saw the slaves as a cheap and reliable source of labor. The planting of tobacco required large tracts of land. These same pieces of land required a proportional workforce to meet the needs of taking care of them. The colonists saw the slaves as a solution to their big farms which needed people to work on them (Gilyard Wardi, 2004).
The use of slavery in colonies was majorly facilitated because of this need for laborers. The colonists were of the view that the slaves only needed a little education. The colonists were encouraged to make use of the African slaves as a source of labor because they thought that the slaves were immune to diseases like malaria. The conception had by colonist towards the slaves was very fascinating as they thought Africans will be an efficacious solution to their labor demand. The colonists made an argument that the African slaves would not find problems in working at their farms because back in the African continent, they were used to farming. They had in mind that the slaves possessed important farming skills (Gilyard Wardi, 2004).
The Northerners and Slavery
Race and Revolution by Nash remarks that, it is a bold and stirring documentation of the collapse of the devotion for liberty in America in the immediate wake of the American Revolution Gary Nash correctly finds that the demise of efforts to abolish slavery and incorporate blacks in American society proceeded directly from an increasingly conservative, white supremacist north, not a self serving south (Nash, 1990).
Throughout the history of mankind and the slavery issue, we find that history is created and interpreted by the north who had power as well as the ability of manipulating the facts and figures of the historical events in their interest. It was the northern part of America which was seen to derail the process of abolishing slavery. The north did actually have some power which saw the persistence of slavery during this revolutionary process. Later on, the southern parts were able to abolish the slavery where the northern parts became the last to do so.
Contrary to the ancient historians, Nash has attributed continued existence of slavery in the revolutionary period to the leaders of the north that were reluctant to give compensation to the slaveholders from the south or even accept America in a biracial form. This was a time that the slavery could actually have been abolished completely. He gives an assertion that the free blacks went native to the discrimination at the north through the creation of alternative institution and organizations such as churches for the blacks. These were meant to safeguard an identity of Africa-America as well as maintain abolitionist fervor. Nash states out that race and revolution is the undeniable story that failed pursuit of freedom that was promised in the revolutionary period. It was the most philosophical crisis of ethics for white Americans at the end of the eighteenth century which became their most tragic failure and disappointment. Nash analyzes the contentious matters challenging the Founding Founders, such as slavery as well as property rights, whilst putting more emphasis on the impressive accomplishments of the Founders that far overshadow their failure to successfully resolve the hot subject of slavery (Nash, 1990).
Nash presents a convincing narrative highlighting that the Founders were very conscious that human slavery was ethically contrary to their uncensored ideology based upon indisputable human rights, but they also understood that leaving out slavery and giving way political and social equality to African slaves would have been incompatible with existing public opinion in the emerging nation. Slavery could therefore persist due to these laws which were not established regarding equality. Therefore to make sure that the slaves did not have any power, the northern leaders did not accept the young nation in a biracial perspective. Nash has stressed that it is no longer the economic and social structures of the south that caused a failure to abolish slave trade as earlier stated by past historians.
The hypocrisy and racism of the north in so far as southern intransigence supported the peculiar institution. Nash explains the free black communitys reaction to this failure of the revolutions promise, its vigorous and articulate pleas for justice, and the communitys successes in building its own African-American institutions within the hostile environment of early nineteenth-century America (Gilyard Wardi, 2004). While his interpretation may startle some, Nash correctly finds the demise of efforts to abolish slavery and incorporate blacks into the American society. This book not only illuminates the failures of Americas leaders during this time, but also brings to the forefront the long ignored role of black revolutionist in the early struggles for freedom.
Colonists Attitude towards SlaveryThe colonialists sought to own slaves during the revolution process. They used the slaves as a source of labor for their farms. In the 1600s, tobacco was regarded as a major source of earnings for many of the colonists. The success economically of the colonist relied entirely on the amount of produce that came from tobacco. This produce was also determined by the labor force. The colonists saw the slaves as a cheap and reliable source of labor. The planting of tobacco required large tracts of land. These same pieces of land required a proportional workforce to meet the needs of taking care of them. The colonists saw the slaves as a solution to their big farms which needed people to work on them (Gilyard Wardi, 2004).
The use of slavery in colonies was majorly facilitated because of this need for laborers. The colonists were of the view that the slaves only needed a little education. The colonists were encouraged to make use of the African slaves as a source of labor because they thought that the slaves were immune to diseases like malaria. The conception had by colonist towards the slaves was very fascinating as they thought Africans will be an efficacious solution to their labor demand. The colonists made an argument that the African slaves would not find problems in working at their farms because back in the African continent, they were used to farming. They had in mind that the slaves possessed important farming skills (Gilyard Wardi, 2004).
The Northerners and Slavery
Race and Revolution by Nash remarks that, it is a bold and stirring documentation of the collapse of the devotion for liberty in America in the immediate wake of the American Revolution Gary Nash correctly finds that the demise of efforts to abolish slavery and incorporate blacks in American society proceeded directly from an increasingly conservative, white supremacist north, not a self serving south (Nash, 1990).
Throughout the history of mankind and the slavery issue, we find that history is created and interpreted by the north who had power as well as the ability of manipulating the facts and figures of the historical events in their interest. It was the northern part of America which was seen to derail the process of abolishing slavery. The north did actually have some power which saw the persistence of slavery during this revolutionary process. Later on, the southern parts were able to abolish the slavery where the northern parts became the last to do so.
Categories:
0 comments:
Post a Comment